Inclusion of De Facto Guardians in the Category of Subjects with Enhanced Liability under Articles 150–151 of the Russian Criminal Code: Social Justification and Interdisciplinary Approach
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.224.7.095-108
Abstract
While recent amendments to criminal legislation in 2022 have strengthened the protection of minors’ rights and lawful interests, however, they have failed to address the differentiation of liability for involving minors in criminal or antisocial activities based on the characteristics of the perpetrator. Meanwhile, the issue remains relevant, as the current list of liable parties under Articles150–151 of the Russian Criminal Code requires expansion. The author’s argument is based on an assessment of the social justification of the criminal law in this part as well as research in family law concerning the concept of de facto upbringing. Studies in this field have established a substantive analogy between the relationships arising from de facto upbringing involving various family members of different degrees of kinship or affinity and parent-child relationships involving biological or adoptive parents, particularly in terms of upbringing. To evaluate the social justification of these criminal prohibitions as a mandatory requirement for criminal law, the author applies the theory of social statuses and roles, which helps identify the behavioral expectations associated with different family members’ statuses, including criminogenic behaviors such as exerting negative influence on minors within de facto upbringing arrangements.
About the Author
Yu. S. KaravaevaRussian Federation
Yulia S. Karavaeva, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Business Law
Perm
References
1. Artemenko NV, Shimbareva NG. Child victims of domestic violence: Responsibility for «parental» crimes. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justitia]. 2020;12:47-51. (In Russ.).
2. Baturina NI, Medvedev IM. The grounds for the emergence of a relationship on the actual upbringing of a child and the circle of persons belonging to the actual caregivers according to the Family Code of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii [Volgograd Academy of the Russian Internal Affairs Ministry’s Digest]. 2018;1(44):46-51. (In Russ.).
3. Bodaevsky VP, Solovyov EA. Social justification of the criminal law situation. Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii [Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the MIA of Russia]. 2020;1(76):20-25. (In Russ.).
4. Karavaeva YuS. Criminally significant legal conditions as special features of the subject of the crime. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Juridical Journal]. 2023;6(153):79-90. (In Russ.).
5. Komissarova EG, Idrysheva SK, Krasnova TV. Personal non-property relations of stepfather and stepson: In search of legal entities. Vestnik Instituta zakonodatelstva i pravovoy informatsii RK. 2022;2(69):73-85. (In Russ.).
6. Komissarova EG. De facto parenting relationships: Problems of family and legal institutionalization. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics]. 2021;1:130-153. (In Russ.).
7. Komissarova EG. Parenthood as a Family law phenomenon: A theoretical look at the current normative origins. Lex russica. 2022;75(6):20-35. (In Russ.).
8. Komissarova EG. Social parents and social upbringing of a child in legal discourse. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law]. 2023;14(2):542-559. (In Russ.).
9. Komissarova EG. The doctrine of direct (actual) parenthood in Russian and foreign family law. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki [Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences]. 2022;56:208-238. (In Russ.).
10. Kopytkova NV. Stepfather and stepmother’s responsibilities for raising stepsons and stepdaughters. The evolution of the state and law: History and modernity. Proceedings of the conference. Part 2. Kursk; 2017. Pp. 63– 65. (In Russ.).
11. Krasnova TV. Education as a unique legal phenomenon and the problems of its modern legal definition. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Russian Laws: Experience, Analysis, Practice]. 2016;9:102-106. (In Russ.).
12. Kulakova AA. Features of legal relations between stepfather (stepmother) and stepson (stepdaughter). Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta [Bulletin of Vladimir Law Institute]. 2018;4(49):107-110. (In Russ.).
13. Malkevich MS. The realization of parental rights in the case of a child living with a stepfather (stepmother), cohabitant (cohabitant). Vestnik SamGU. 2014;5(116):240-244. (In Russ.).
14. Merton R. Social theory and social structure. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
15. Mingalimova MF, Bagautdinov ShF. Criminal liability for the involvement of minors in the commission of crimes. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justitia]. 2023;5:57-65. (In Russ.).
16. Osmolovskaya SI. On the question of the types of a special subject involving a minor in the commission of a crime. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2022;18(3):266-270. (In Russ.).
17. Savenok AL. Social justification of the criminal law. Vestnik Akademii MVD Respubliki Belarus. 2011;1(21):130- 135. (In Russ.).
18. Spiridonov LI. Sociology of criminal law. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1986. (In Russ.).
19. Tatarintseva EA. Models of legal relations for the upbringing of a child in the family and the trends of their formation in national family law: A monograph. Moscow: Yustitsinform; 2018. (In Russ.).
20. Voronina ZI. Institute of actual upbringing in Family Law. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. 1992;5:98-102. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Karavaeva Yu.S. Inclusion of De Facto Guardians in the Category of Subjects with Enhanced Liability under Articles 150–151 of the Russian Criminal Code: Social Justification and Interdisciplinary Approach. Lex Russica. 2025;78(7):95-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.224.7.095-108