Ancient Holism and Modern Theory of Constitutional Law

Abstract

This article discusses some aspects of the impact of the ancient holism on the modern theory of constitutional law. The concept of an ideal state of Plato and Aristotle called for respect for the balance between the individual and society, the abilities of the individual and public interests. Philosophers have not opposed the society and the State, but sought to develop the theoretical basis of the harmonious state of all social institutions for development policy. The teaching of ancient Greek thinkers on holism is still valid and can be used to explain the main processes of the modern theory of constitutional law. The study justifies the advantages of holism as a methodological nucleus in regulating individual institutions of the State and law before reductional approach. Among the advantages of holism as methodology are the possibility of tiered application; congruence of scientific knowledge with a diversity of the research objects of such integrated science as a constitutional law; orientation to the systematic study of objects. Consideration is being given to the possibility of applying a holistic approach (with its recognition of the integrity of the process and the priority of Unity) to solve some multilevel tasks of law. Special attention is paid to the analysis of contemporary array of human rights from the perspective of ancient holism. Rethinking of the role of the State and the law is closely connected with the desire to create an efficient constitutional system in terms of finding the right balance of public and private interests. The author raises the question of considering the developed in ancient Greece category of "common good" as one of the fundamental concepts of modern axiology.