Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

25 YEARS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: IMPLEMENTATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL MODELS

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2018.144.11.009-015

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the analysis of several issues related to the implementation and development of constitutional models. The author emphasizes and highlights the role of the current Constitution as a political and legal instrument providing purposeful administration of diverse changes associated with the change of political, economic, legal and, in the end, socio-political order in general. It is noted that constitutional models set forth in the Basic Law of the State in their organic totality provide for a "future plan" for Russia and establish guidelines for the development of the society and the State. Special attention is paid to the consideration of the reasons influencing the quality of implementation of constitutional models. The key reason involves the objective features of the cultural and historical context under which the 1993 Constitution began to operate. Implementation of Constitutional objectives started during the period when legal and institutional basis corresponding to the new constitutional determinations did not exist, and old and new ideas concerning approved and acceptable future, strategy and tactics of the country's development were coexisting and competing in both social consciousness and consciousness of elites. The persistence of such competing perceptions and corresponding models of the desired future still influence the quality and completeness of "constitutional intentions" implementation. The paper shows that the analysis of constitutional models implementation strongly requires the use of cross-disciplinary approaches, since any research with regard to the "constitutional plan" and its factual implementation, and, even more, the search for the reasons of the current state of affairs, necessarily goes beyond the scope of the subject area of constitutional law, namely: political science, social psychology, history, economics.

About the Author

S. M. Shahray
Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова; Институт социально-политических исследований РАН
Russian Federation


References

1. Столыпин П. А. Нам нужна Великая Россия. Полное собрание речей в Государственной думе и Государственном совете. 1906-1911. М. : Молодая гвардия, 1991. С. 62-65

2. Нефедов Д. В. Экономическая теория как основание конституционного толкования // Правоведение. 2013. № 5 (310). C. 215-223

3. Послание Президента Федеральному Собранию. 1 марта 2018 г. // URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/ president/news/56957#sel=155:1:1kp,155:4:vpk (дата обращения: 24.06.2018)

4. Шахрай С. М. О Конституции: Основной закон как инструмент правовых и социально-политических преобразований. М. : Наука, 2013. 919 с

5. Гаджиев Г. А. Экономическая Конституция. Конституционные гарантии свободы предпринимательской (экономической) деятельности // Конституционный вестник № 1 (19). 2008. С. 249-263

6. Попова С. М., Шахрай С. М. «Звезды и тернии» федеративного выбора России: строительство новой федеративной государственности (1994-1999) // Становление федерализма в России : Документы и материалы (1986-1999) : в 2 ч. М. : Фонд современной истории, 2014. Ч. 2 : Строительство новой федеративной государственности в России: проблемы, поиски, решения (1993-1999). С. 51-114

7. Эбзеев Б. С. Актуальные проблемы реализации Конституции России 1993 года // Вестник Саратовской государственной юридической академии. 2018. № 1 (120). С. 24

8. Transition to a New Model of Economy and Its Constitutional Reflections: Proceedings of the UniDem Seminar Organized in Moscow on 18 and 19 February 1993, in Co-operation with the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation. Science and technique of democracy (Volume 4). European Commission for Democracy through Law, Russia (Federation). Verkhovnyi Sovet. Strasbourg. Council of Europe, 1993. P. 28

9. Alberts S., Warshaw Ch., Weingast B. R. Countermajoritarian Institutions and Constitutional Stability // URL: http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/LEO/LEO_Weingast.pdf (дата обращения: 16.06.2018)

10. Ginsburg Т., Elkins Z., Melton J. The Lifespan of Written Constitutions // Alumni Magazine. Spring 2009. URL: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/alumni/magazine/lifespan (дата обращения: 16.06.2018)

11. Кутафин О. Е. Источники конституционного права Российской Федерации. М. : Юристъ, 2002. С. 171, 173

12. Хабриева Т. Я., Чиркин В. Е. Теория современной конституции. М. : Норма, 2005. С. 16-18

13. Кабышев В. Т. О фактической и юридической Конституции России 1993 года // Вестник Саратовской государственной юридической академии. 2014. № 1 (96). С. 36


Review

For citations:


Shahray S.M. 25 YEARS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: IMPLEMENTATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL MODELS. Lex Russica. 2018;(11):9-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2018.144.11.009-015

Views: 621


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)