Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

"Ruling Machine" or Legalization of Technology

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.146.1.119-143

Abstract

The paper is devoted to complex and multifaceted relations arising in the field of public administration, the symbolic embodiment of which is the “ruling machine”. There is a long tradition based on the analogy between the machine mechanism and human social structures. Since the era of the absolutist states and the industrial revolution, these analogies have been transferred to a special social and organizational structure, which is “bureaucracy”. A special place is occupied by the technique of management, technology of domination and organizational and technical standards, which gives the bureaucracy an image of a technical structure rather than a human team. At the same time, the strict regulation of this structure, based on a system of norms, regulations and codifications, makes the bureaucratic structure permeable to the mechanisms of legal regulation. Historically, the “ruling machine” has demonstrated its adaptability to a variety of political, economic and legal contexts, demonstrating its technical “neutrality”.

About the Author

I. A. Isaev
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Russian Federation

Isaev Igor Andreevich, Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of History of State and Law 

125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9

 



References

1. Agamben G. Tsarstvo i slava [The Kingdom and the Glory]. Moscow. St. Petersburg., 2018.

2. Arendt H. Vita active, ili o deyatelnoy zhizni [Vita active (Active Life)]. St. Petersburg, 2000.

3. Benoist A. de. Protiv liberalizma [Against liberalism]. St. Petersburg, 2009.

4. Benjamin W. Frants Kafka [Franz Kafka]. Moscow, 2000.

5. Weber M. Teoriya stupeney i napravleniy religioznogo nepriyatiya mira. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Theory of steps and directions of religious rejection of the world. Selected works]. Moscow, 1990.

6. Weber M. Khozyaystvo i obshchestvo. Sotsiologiya [Economy and Society. Sociology]. Moscow, 2016.

7. Heisenberg V. Estestvoznanie i tekhnika v politicheskikh sobytiyakh nashego vremeni. Izbrannye filosofskie raboty [Natural science and technology in the political events of our time. Selected philosophical works]. St. Petersburg, 2006.

8. Guénon R. Tsarstvo kolichestva i znameniya vremeni [The reign of quantity and the signs of the times]. Moscow, 2003.

9. Goldner E. Analiz organizatsii [Analysis of the organization]. Sotsiologiya segodnya. Problemy i perspektivy [Sociology today. Problems and prospects]. Moscow, 1965.

10. Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. Anti-Edip [Anti-Oedipus]. St. Petersburg, 2007.

11. Davis E. Tekhnopolis: mif, magiya i mistitsizm v informatsionnuyu epokhu [Technopolis: myth, magic and mysticism in the information age]. Ekaterinburg, 2017.

12. Sieferle R.P. Istoricheskie etapy kritiki tekhniki [Historical stages critics of technics]. Filosofiya tekhniki v FRG: obzor [Philosophy of technology in Germany: review]. Moscow, 1989.

13. Mumford L. Mif mashiny [The myth of the machine]. Moscow, 2001.

14. . Novalis. Fragmenty [Fragments]. St. Petersburg, 1995.

15. Rapp F. Filosofiya tekhniki: obzor [Philosophy of technology: review]. Filosofiya tekhniki v FRG: obzor [Philosophy of technology in Germany: review]. Moscow, 1989.

16. Ryklin M. Kniga do knigi. Benyamin V. Frants Kafka. [Book before the book]. Benjamin V. Franz Kafka. Moscow, 2000.

17. Filippov A.R. Kritika Leviafana. Shmitt K. Leviafan v uchenii o gosudarstve Tomasa Gobbsa [Critique of the Leviathan. Schmitt K. Leviathan in the doctrine of the state of Thomas Hobbes]. St. Petersburg, 2006.

18. Filosofiya tekhniki v FRG: obzor [Philosophy of technology in Germany: review]. Moscow, 1989.

19. . Foucault M. Bezopasnost, territoriya, naselenie [Security, territory, population]. St. Petersburg, 2011.

20. Heidegger M. Vopros o tekhnike. Vremya i bytie [The question of technology. Time and being]. St. Petersburg, 2007.

21. Hardt M., Negri A. Imperiya [Empire]. Moscow, 2004.

22. Huning A. Homo mengura: lyudi — eto ikh tekhnika — tekhnika prisushcha cheloveku [Homo mengura: people — this is their technique — technique inherent in man]. Filosofiya tekhniki v FRG: obzor [Philosophy of technology in Germany: review]. Moscow, 1989.

23. Shaposhnikov V.A. Matematicheskaya mifologiya. Sotsiokulturnaya filosofiya matematiki [Mathematical mythology. Socio-cultural philosophy of mathematics]. St. Petersburg, 1999.

24. Schmitt K. Diktatura [Dictatorship]. St. Petersburg, 2009.

25. Schmitt K. Leviafan v uchenii o gosudarstve Tomasa Gobbsa [Leviathan in the doctrine of the state of Thomas Hobbes]. St. Petersburg, 2006.

26. Spengler O. Dengi i mashina. Pessimizm? [The money and the machine. Pessimism?] Moscow, 2003.

27. Spengler O. Zakat Evropy [The Decline of the West]. Moscow, 1998. Vol. 2.

28. Spengler O. Chelovek i tekhnika [Man and technology]. Antologiya. Logika kultury [Anthology. Logic of culture]. St. Petersburg, 2009.

29. Evola Yu. «Rabochiy» v tvorchestve Ernsta Yurgera [“Working” in the works of Ernst Jurger]. St. Petersburg, 2005.

30. Yunger F. Sovershenstvo tekhniki [The perfection of technique]. St. Petersburg, 2002.

31. Junger E. Geliopolis. Utopiya i antiutopiya XX veka [Heliopolis. Utopia and dystopia of the 20th century]. Moscow, 1992.

32. Junger E. Rabochiy, gospodstvo i geshtaldt [Worker, domination and gestalt]. St. Petersburg, 2000.

33. Jaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The meaning and purpose of the history]. Moscow, 1999.


Review

For citations:


Isaev I.A. "Ruling Machine" or Legalization of Technology. Lex Russica. 2019;(1):119-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.146.1.119-143

Views: 795


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)