P. I. Novgorodtsev’s Neo-Kantianism: Novgorodtsev and Savalskiy Debate
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.147.2.151-162
Abstract
The paper presents an analysis of one episode from the life of two Russian scientists, namely the discussion between P. Novgorodtsev and his student V. Savalskiy. All the poignancy of the episode lies in the fact that both opposing thinkers had been followers of neokantianism trends in philosophy, and defended the concept of natural law. In addition, a detailed description of life and work of the little-known philosopher of law Vasiliy Alexandrovich Savalskiy is given. It is noted that at the beginning of his scientific search, he became the main researcher and critic of the teachings of neo-kantians in Russia. During his time at the University of Warsaw V. Savalskiy studied the problems of history and theory of state and law, constitutional law.
About the Author
V. N. Belov
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Belov Vladimir Nikolaevich, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Ontology and Theory of Knowledge
117198, Russia, Moscow, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, d. 6
References
1. Dmitrieva N.A. Russkoe neokantianstvo: Marburg v Rossii: istoriko-filosofskie ocherki [Russian Neo-Kantianism: Marburg in Russia. Historical and philosophical essays]. M., 2007. 512 p.
2. Novgorodtsev P.I. Istoricheskaya shkola yuristov, ee proiskhozhdenie i sudba: opyt kharakteristiki osnov shkoly Savini v ikh posledovatelnom razvitii [Historical school of lawyers, its origin and destiny: experience of the characteristics of the basics of the Savigny school in their consistent development]. Moscow, 1896. 238 p.
3. Novgorodtsev P.I. Kant i Gegel v ikh ucheniyakh o prave i gosudarstve. Dva tipicheskikh postroeniya v oblasti filosofii prava [Kant and Hegel in their doctrines on law and state. Two typical constructions in the field of philosophy of law]. Moscow, 1901. 248 p.
4. Novgorodtsev P.I. Nravstvennyy idealizm v filosofii prava (k voprosu o vozrozhdenii estestvennogo prava) [Moral idealism in the philosophy of law (on the revival of natural law)]. Problemy idealizma [Problems of idealism]. Moscow, 1902. Pp. 236—296.
5. Novgorodtsev P.I. Russkiy posledovatel G. Kogena [Russian follower of G. Cohen]. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii [Questions of philosophy and psychology]. 1909. No. 99. Pp. 636—662.
6. Ot redaktsii [Editorial Note]. Logos Publ. 1910. Kniga pervaya [Book one]. Pp. 1—9.
7. Petrazhitskiy L.I. Vvedenie v izuchenie prava i nravstvennosti [Introduction to the study of law and morality]. St. Petersburg, 1905. 271 p.
8. Petrazhitskiy L.I. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriey nravstvennosti: v 2 t. [Theory of law and state in connection with the theory of morality: in 2 vol.]. St. Petersburg, 1907. Vol. 1. 308 p., Vol. 2. Pp. 309—656.
9. Poma A. Kriticheskaya filosofiya Germana Kogena [Critical philosophy of German Cohen]. Moscow, 2012. 319 p.
10. Ryabov P.V. Rossiyskoe kantianstvo i neokantianstvo nachala XX veka v neopublikovannykh memuarakh A.A. Borovogo [Russian Kantianism and Neo-Kantianism of the early 20th century in the unpublished memoirs of the A.A. Borovoy]. Kantovskiy sbornik [Kant’s collection]. 2010. No. 4. Pp. 97—104.
11. Savalskiy V. Otvet prof. Novgorodtsevu [Response to Prof. Novgorodtsev]. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii [Questions of philosophy and psychology]. 1910. No. 105. Pp. 341—382.
12. Savalskiy V.A. Vvedenie v filosofiyu prava [Introduction to the philosophy of law]. Kriticheskoe obozrenie [Critical review]. 1907. Vol. 5. Pp. 6—13.
13. Savalskiy V.A. Osnovy filosofii prava v nauchnom idealizme. Marburgskaya shkola filosofii: Kogen, Natorp, Shtammler i dr. [Fundamentals of the philosophy of law in scientific idealism. Marburg school of philosophy: Cohen, Natorp, Stammler et al.]. 1908. Vol. 1. 360 p.
14. Fokht B.A. V.A. Savalskiy. Osnovy filosofii prava v nauchnom idealizme. Marburgskaya shkola filosofii: Kogen, Natorp, Shtammler i dr. [V.A. Savalskiy. The Foundations of the philosophy of law of scientific idealism. Marburg school of philosophy: Cohen, Natorp, Stammler, et al.]. Vol.1. Moscow, 1908. VII + 360. Critical review. Moscow, 1909. Vol. 2. Pp. 66—74.
15. Cohen H. Ethik des reinen Willens. 2. Aufl. Berlin, 1907. 679 p.
Review
For citations:
Belov V.N. P. I. Novgorodtsev’s Neo-Kantianism: Novgorodtsev and Savalskiy Debate. Lex Russica. 2019;(2):151-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.147.2.151-162
Views:
504
Email this article 