Development of Court Practice in Cases Involving Human Genomics: World Experience and Russia

The legal regulation of the area of human genomics covering both research in the area of human genome and activities carried out to implement their results in life, is today in the stage of development and is tightly linked to scientific progress in the area under consideration. In this regard, the analysis of judicial practice is an important indicator that allows the author to determine problematic practical issues of formation and development of legal regulation in the area under consideration. The best international jurisprudence and case law in the field of the human genome is sporadic and embodies the diversity of approaches to the legal regulation of these issues in different legal systems. If in the USA and Europe such judicial practice began to develop since the end of the twentieth century, in Russia the first case involving the genome was considered in the middle of the current decade, which generally corresponds to the catch-up dynamics of development of Russian law in the area in question. The paper is aimed at the study of the best jurisprudence in the world concerning genomic studies and implementation of their results, including the legal positions of the ECHR and the US courts, as well as the emerging practice of Russian courts. The paper covers judicial practice both in the field of genetic engineering and in the field of genomic information circulation. The paper analyzes specific cases in the area of human genomics dealt with in the course of judicial proceedings on both sides of the Atlantic. It also covers the issues of reflecting the genomic research in the practice of Russian courts, e.g. in Prosecutor Kemerovo v. IK-22. In addition, an attempt is made, on the basis of performed analysis, to identify differences in approaches to legal regulation in different legal systems.

1. Kalinichenko P. A. Praktika suda evropeyskogo soyuza po rassmotreniyu obrashcheniy rossiyskikh grazhdan i yuridicheskikh lits [Practice of the Court of the European Union on consideration of appeals of Russian citizens and legal entities]. Lex Russica. 2010. No. 5. P. 1076—1089. (In Russ.)

2. Lyanov M. M. Razvitie bazy dannykh DNK v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Development of the DNA database in the Russian Federation: Problems and prospects of development]. Scientific Journal of Baikal State University. 2018. No. 2. P. 59—67. (In Russ.)

3. Mokhov A. A., Butnaru D. V., Yavorsky A. N. Redaktirovanie genoma embriona cheloveka: pravovoy aspekt [Editing the human embryo genome: Legal aspect]. Obrazovanie i pravo [Education and Law]. 2019. No. 1. P. 227—234. (In Russ.)

4. Mokhov A. A., Yavorskiy A. N. Geny i inye obrazovaniya na osnove genov kak obekty prava intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Genes and other formations based on genes as objects of intellectual property law]. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law], 2018, No. 4, P. 27—31. (In Russ.)

5. Tricoz E. N., Gulyaeva E. E. Pozitsii ESPCh po nekotorym voprosam bioetiki i geneticheskikh dannykh [ECHR stance on some issues of bioethics and genetic data]. Advances in Law Studies. 2018. Vol. 6. no. 4. URL: https:// riorpub.com/ru/nauka/article/24159/view (date of access: April 22, 2019).

6. Establishing best practice for DNA databases. A report by the Forensic Genetics Policy Initiative. Forensic Genetics Policy Initiative. London., September 2017. 111 p.

7. French S. Genetic Testing in the Workplace: The Employer’s Coin Toss. Duke Law & Technology. Abstract. 2002. No. 1. P. 1—13.