Secondment of the Employees' Labor (Personnel's s Labor) as an Atypical Form of Employment
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.153.8.063-073
Abstract
The article considers legal relations arising between the employee, the primary employer and the seconding employer when a secondment agreement is made to provide staff (personnel) and when the employment contract is made between the employee and the seconding employer represented by a private employment agency. It is noted that secondment of staff (personnel) is one of the legalized forms of atypical employment in the Russian Federation, the author considers peculiarities of such relations. The author discusses the problem of “precarization” of employees’ labor temporarily sent to the secondment employer, considers the mechanisms of protection of workers from deterioration of their legal status and determines inefficiency of such mechanisms. The paper considers the issues related to 1) modification of traditional approaches to regulation of labor relations with employees temporarily sent to another entity performing the functions of the employer; 2) the problems of implementation of collective rights of workers; 3) the refusal to use traditional mechanisms of bringing employees to disciplinary and financial responsibility; and 4) the “splitting” of the status of the employer between the primary employer and the seconding employer.
Keywords
secondment agreement,
private employment agency,
atypical forms of employment,
“precarization” of labor of workers temporarily sent to the seconding employer,
term employment contract,
right to participate in social partnership,
allocation of labor protection responsibilities between the primary employer and the private employment agency
Supporting agencies: The publication was prepared within the framework of the scientific project No. 18-29-16126 supported by the RFBR.
About the Author
N. V. Chernykh
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Chernykh Nadezhda Vyacheslavovna, PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Labor Law and Social Security Law
125993, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. German P., Berezhnov A. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie «zaemnogo truda» po zakonodatelstvu Rossii i Germanii [Legal regulation of “borrowed labor” under the laws of Russia and Germany]. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom [Labor Law in Russia and Abroad]. 2016. No. 3. P. 54—59. (In Russ.)
2. Zaitseva L. V., Chukreev A. A. Chastnye agentstva zanyatosti i zaemnyy trud v Rossii: sravnitelno-pravovoe issledovanie [Private employment agencies and precarious work in Russia: Comparative Study]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki [Bulletin of Perm University. Law Sciences].2017. No. 1. P. 84—94. (In Russ.)
3. Kostyan I. A. Voprosy legalizatsii zaemnogo truda [Issues of legalization of precarious labor]. Kadrovik. Trudovoe pravo dlya kadrovika. [Trained worker. Labor law for the personnel officer].2007. No. 10. (In Russ.)
4. Lushnikova M. V., Lushnikov A. M. Ocherki teorii trudovogo prava [Essays of the Theory of Labor Law]. St. Petersburg, R. Aslanov “Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press” Publ. house, 2006. 940 p. (In Russ.)
5. Lyutov N.L. Priznaki trudovogo pravootnosheniya: mezhdunarodnye normy i rossiyskaya sudebnaya praktika [Signs of labor relations: international norms and Russian jurisprudence]. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom [Labor Law in Russia and Abroad]. 2016. No. 4. P. 7—11. (In Russ.)
6. Lyutov N. L. Srochnyy trudovoy dogovor kak instrument neustoychivoy zanyatosti: mnogokratnoe perezaklyuchenie i vozmozhnost zaklyucheniya s nauchno-pedagogicheskimi rabotnikami [A term employment contract as an instrument of precarious employment: multiple conclusion and the possibility of conclusion with scientific and pedagogical workers]. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom [Labor Law in Russia and Abroad]. 2018. No. 4. P. 20—23. (In Russ.)
7. Lyutov N. L. Trudovye otnosheniya s kollektivnym rabotodatelem: perspektivy pravovogo regulirovaniya [Labour relations with a collective employer: Perspectives of Legal Regulation]. Lex Russica. 2018. No. 12. P. 9—17. (In Russ.)
8. Mzhavanadze E. A. Trudovoy dogovor i netipichnye formy zanyatosti [An employment Contract and atypical forms of employment]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Actual Problems of Russian Law]. 2013. No. 8. P. 987—993. (In Russ.)
9. Perederin S. V. Kompleksnoe trudovoe pravootnoshenie ili kompleks trudovykh pravootnosheniy [Complex labor relations or a complex of labor relations?]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Law]. 2018. No. 4 (35). P. 249—258. (In Russ.)
10. Potapova N. D. Zapret zaemnogo truda i netipichnye formy zanyatosti [Prohibition of precarious labor and atypical forms of employment]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy [Russian Journal of Legal Studies]. 2016. No. 3 (8). P. 132—137. (In Russ.)
11. Salikova N. M. «Zaemnyy trud», ili Ispolzovanie truda rabotnikov po dogovoru o predostavlenii personala [“Precarious labor”, or the use of labor of workers under the secondment contract]. Vestnik Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava [Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law].2015. No. 4 (33). P. 45—54. (In Russ.)
12. Tsypkina I. S. Regulirovanie truda rabotnikov, napravlyaemykh rabotodatelem k drugim fizicheskim ili yuridicheskim litsam po dogovoru o predostavlenii truda personala [Regulation of labor of employees sent by the employer to other natural or legal entities under the secondment contract]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Actual Problems of Russian Law]. 2017. No. 3. P. 160—167. (In Russ.)
13. Chicanova L. A., Nurtdinova A. F. Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya rossiyskogo trudovogo zakonodatelstva [The main directions of development of the Russian labor legislation]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law].2010. No. 5. P. 5—19. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Chernykh N.V. Secondment of the Employees' Labor (Personnel's s Labor) as an Atypical Form of Employment. Lex Russica. 2019;(8):63-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.153.8.063-073
Views:
649
Email this article 