Role of Legal Principles in Eliminating and Minimizing the Risks of Genomic Technologies
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.153.8.121-128
Abstract
The use of modern genomic technologies, along with the benefits to the man and society, can lead to negative consequences. Such risks exist both in the process and after the production, isolation, modification, storage of DNA. Prior to detailed legislative regulation of relations regarding the use of genomic technologies for medicinal purposes and not for medical reasons, legal principles become vital.
The paper formulates the following basic legal principles of genomic technologies application: the principle of preventive actions of the state to protect citizens from the risks of using genomic technologies; the principle of preserving the human genome as a special species; the principle of guaranteeing the inviolability of the individual of every citizen when using genomic technologies; the principle of priority of life and health of citizens over the interests of science and society; the principle of equality of citizens regardless of genetic characteristics; the principle of protection of genetic information of every citizen as part of personal data; the principle of guaranteeing access to the citizen’s own genetic information. Legal principles can be used to resolve a dispute by analogy of law.
Keywords
About the Author
M. N. MaleinaRussian Federation
Maleina Marina Nikolaevna, Doctor of Law, Professor, Professor of the Department of Civil Law
125993, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Akulenko L. V., Ugarov I.V. Meditsinskaya genetika [Medical genetics]. Edited by O. O. Yanushevich, S. D. Arutyunov. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2011. 208 p.
2. Vakhrusheva D. Khochesh rabotu — sday analiz [You Want a Job — Have Yourself Tested]. Trud [Labor]. 2010. May 31.
3. Zhuk E. I. Otsenka gendernogo kontrolya v sporte s tochki zreniya prav cheloveka [Evaluation of gender control in sport from the point of view of human rights]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo [Constitutional and Municipal Law]. 2012. No. 8. P. 41—43.
4. Koroteev A. L. Invazivnye vmeshatelstva v prenatalnoy diagnostike nasledstvennykh i vrozhdennykh bolezney [Invasive interventions in prenatal diagnosis of hereditary and congenital diseases]. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney [Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases]. 2007. Vol. 56. Issue. 1. P. 110—119.
5. Montgomery J. Modifikatsiya genoma cheloveka: vyzovy so storony sfery prav cheloveka, obuslovlennye nauchno-tekhnicheskimi dostizheniyami [Modification of the human genome: challenges from the sphere of human rights caused by scientific and technical achievements]. Pretsedenty evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Precedents of the European Court of Human Rights]. 2018. No. 3. P. 42—56.
6. Risk-orientirovannoe gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie: mezhdunarodnyy opyt i rossiyskaya praktika [Riskbased government regulation: international experience and Russian practice]. Analiticheskie obzory Instituta gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i upravleniya Rossiyskoy akademii narodnogo khozyaystva i gosudarstvennoy sluzhby pri Prezidente RF [Analytical reviews of the Institute of public service and management of the Russian Presedential Academy of National Economy and Public Administartion]. Moscow, 2015. No. 4. 78 p.
7. Sokolov A. Yu., Bogatyreva N. V. Opredelenie urovnya riska v oblasti genno-inzhenernoy deyatelnosti [Determination of the level of risk in the field of genetic engineering]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess [Administrative Law and Procedure]. 2018. No. 8. P. 32—36.
Review
For citations:
Maleina M.N. Role of Legal Principles in Eliminating and Minimizing the Risks of Genomic Technologies. Lex Russica. 2019;(8):121-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.153.8.121-128