Administrative Justice in the Soviet Period (Analysis of the Doctrine, Legislation and Procedure of the First Half of the 20th Century)
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.170.1.067-081
Abstract
Socio-political significance and legal status of the institute of administrative justice are widely understood in the context of the thorough analysis of Soviet theory, legislation and practice of the first half of the last century. The choice of the subject matter of the study is preconditioned by the universally recognized periodization, according to which administrative justice in the Soviet period reached the highest level of development in the first half of the 20th century after the foundations of civil proceedings of the Union of the SSR and the Soviet Union Republics were approved in 1961. From this point of view, it is very interesting and useful to study the objective circumstances that took place in the first half of the last century. The study covers the beginning of the Soviet path of development and improvement of the institute of administrative justice, the lower border of which constitutes the final moment of the establishment of Soviet power, and the upper border covers the post-war period of the Soviet Union. The grounds, conditions and procedure of settlement of complaints against actions of Soviet institutions and officials are identified by various bodies. The selected subject matter was actualized during the development and adoption of the first Administrative Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as in the course of institutional reform aimed at ensuring the rule of law, including in the areas of public administration and local government.
The purpose of this paper is to study the issues of regulation of public relations arising between the Soviet State represented by public authorities, their officials, state officials, on the one hand, and Soviet citizens and their associations, on the other. To achieve this goal, the following tasks are set: studying the normative legal acts of the Soviet power issued by the central election commissions, All-Russian congresses of councils, people's commissariats, workers'-peasants' inspectorates, councils of workers'-and-peasants' defenses and many other Soviet institutions regulating administrative justice in the first half of the 20th century; determination of grounds, conditions and procedure for appealing or challenging the legality of acts, decisions, actions or omissions to act on behalf of Soviet institutions and officials; analysis of the legal thought of the first half of the 20th century.
About the Authors
E. B. AblaevaRussian Federation
Elvira B. Ablaeva - Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Legal Disciplines, Astana University.
prosp. Abaya, d. 13, Nur-Sultan, 010000.
A. R. Ensebayeva
Russian Federation
Anel R. Ensebayeva - Cand. Sci. (Law), Leading Researcher, Research Center for the Study of Administrative and Criminal Justice, Research Institute of Judicial and Legal Innovative Projects, Academy of Justice under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
ul. Beybitshilik, d. 46, Nur-Sultan, 010000.
M. A. Utanov
Russian Federation
Mukhtarkhan A. Utanov - Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Institute of Postgraduate Education, Academy of Justice under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
ul. Beybitshilik, d. 46, Nur-Sultan, 010000.
References
1. Abramov S. V sovetskom prave ne mozhet byt administrativnogo iska [In Soviet law there can be no administrative claim]. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost [Socialist Legality]. 1947;3(March):8—10. (In Russ.).
2. BraginskIy M. obzor sovetskogo zakonodatelstva za vremya s 8 po 14 fevralya 1925 goda [Review of Soviet Legislation during the period from 8 to 14 February 1925]. Ezhenedelnik sovetskoy yustitsii [Soviet Justice Weekly].. 1925;7:166—167. (In Russ.)
3. Vilenskiy S. Novoe polozhenie o distsiplinarnykh sudakh [New Regulation on Disciplinary Courts]. Ezhenedelnik sovetskoy yustitsii [Soviet Justice Weekly]. 1926;31(8 August):941—943 (In Russ.).
4. Elistratov AI. ob utverzhdenii zakonnosti v sovetskom stroitelstve [On the approval of legality in Soviet construction]. Sovetskoe pravo [Soviet Law]. 1922;1:128—134 (In Russ.).
5. Zagryatskov MD. Administrativnaya yustitsiya i pravo zhaloby v teorii i zakonodatelstve (razvitie idei i printsipov administrativnoy yustitsii. Administrativnyy protsess i pravo zhaloby v sovetskom zakonodatelstve) [Administrative Justice and the Law of Complaint in Theory and Legislation (Development of the Idea and Principles of Administrative Justice. Administrative Procedure and law of complaint in Soviet legislation)]. Moscow: Pravo i Zhizn Publ.; 1924 (In Russ.).
6. Kayumov DR. K voprosu zarozhdeniya i stanovleniya administrativnoy yustitsii v Rossii [On the issue of the origin and formation of administrative justice in Russia]. Journal of the Mining Institute. 2003;155(1):272—275 (In Russ.).
7. Kleyman AF. Voprosy grazhdanskogo protsessa v svyazi s sudebnoy praktikoy [Issues of civil process in connection with judicial practice]. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost [Socialist Legality]. 1946;9:11-14. (In Russ.)
8. Nizhnik NS, Dergileva SYu. Gosudarstvo i pravo v teoreticheskom nasledii A. I. Elistratova [The state and law in the theoretical heritage of A. I. Yelistratov]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta MVD Rossii. 2014;2(62):66—73 (In Russ.).
9. Nosov E. K voprosu o teorii sovetskoy administrativnoy yustitsii [To the question of the theory of Soviet administrative justice]. Sovetskoe pravo. Zhurnal instituta sovetskogo prava [Soviet Law. Journal of the Institute of Soviet Law]. 1925;4(16):70—85 (In Russ.)
10. Zadachi pravovogo stroitelstva [Problems of Legal Construction]. In: Proletarskaya revolyutsiya i pravo [Proletarian Revolution and Law]. 1921;15:83—86 (In Russ.)
11. Starilov YuN. Administrativnaya yustitsiya v Rossii [Administrative justice in Russia]. Lex russica. 2016;1:21—33 (In Russ.)
12. Starilov YuN. Administrativnaya yustitsiya: problemy teorii [Administrative Justice: Problems of Theory]. In: Starilov YuN, editor. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: razvitie teorii i formirovanie administrativno-protsessualnogo zakonodatelstva [Administrative Judicial Proceedings in the Russian Federation: Development of Theory and Formation of Administrative Procedural Legislation]. Issue 7. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publ.; 2013 (In Russ.).
13. Chechot DM. Administrativnaya yustitsiya. Teoreticheskie problemy [Administrative Justice. Theoretical problems]. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta Publ.; 1973 (In Russ.).
14. Shabanov VV. Rassmotrenie zhalob grazhdan kak forma kontrolya nad sovetskim gosudarstvennym apparatom (1917-1927) [Consideration of citizens' complaints as a form of control over the Soviet state apparatus (1917— 1927)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2013;9:33—37. (In Russ.)
15. Schwarzburg A. O poryadke obzhalovaniya deystviy mestnykh organov vlasti [On the procedure of appeal against actions of local authorities]. Vestnik sovetskoy yustitsii. 1927;1 (87):167—171 (In Russ.).
16. Sheimin PN. Uchebnik prava vnutrennego upravleniya (politseyskogo prava). Obshchaya chast [Textbook of internal administration law (police law). General part. In: Starilov YuN, editor. Russian police (administrative) law: The end of the 19th — early 20th century: A chrestomathy. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publ.; 1999 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ablaeva E.B., Ensebayeva A.R., Utanov M.A. Administrative Justice in the Soviet Period (Analysis of the Doctrine, Legislation and Procedure of the First Half of the 20th Century). Lex Russica. 2021;74(1):67-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.170.1.067-081