Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Public Domain in Cross-border Copyright Law Relations

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2016.121.12.056-067

Abstract

The article deals with the institution of the public domain: the basis of its content and regulation in international copyright law, as well as implementation of universal international agreements in the sphere of copyright in the national law of the states parties to such agreements. The author identifies common features of entrenchment of the institute of public domain in national copyright law of states that formed under the influence of the process of law harmonization: defining conditions of transferring works to public domain and the limits of using such works based on the law-of-the-state-of-protection conflict-of-law connecting factor"(lex loci protectionis), entrenchment of an exclusive rights expiration criteria as a legal basis for transferring a work into public domain; legal recognition of public domain as a part of a culture of a society that should be available to everyone. For an in-depth research, the institute of public domain in copyright law is more thoroughly discussed in terms of law and order in the United States, France and Russia. The author dwells on the problems that characterize the effectiveness of the institute of public domain in modern cross-border relations and that arise due to different levels of economic and cultural development of states and territoriality of international copyright law: different understanding of relations covered by public domain, different approaches to defining the moment of transfer of works into public domain, an undeveloped regime of public domain and sanctions for its infringement, almost complete abandonment of extraterritoriality of norms of the institute of public domain. As a result of research, the author brings forward proposals to improve legal regulation of public domain in the Russian Federation. For authors wishing to convey their work into public domain, the author proposes that the legal framework order should be established; choice of law rules in determining the holder of exclusive rights conveyed by means of a trans-boundary contract and recovered after being transferred to public domain on the ground of a conflict-of-laws connecting factor "the law of the country of origin" (lex origin); clarification of rights of authors that are derived from works that previously had remained in public domain and later were restored in protection of works.

About the Author

O. V. Lutkova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation


References

1. Иванов Н. Общественное достояние как специальный правовой режим использования произведения // Интеллектуальная собственность. Авторское право и смежные права. - 2005. - № 2.

2. Кобляков Н., Мартьянова Т. Общественное достояние как особый правовой режим объектов авторского права // Интеллектуальная собственность. Авторское право и смежные права. - 2001. - № 4.

3. Кондрушенко А. Общественное достояние и свободное программное обеспечение // Патенты и лицензии. - 2007. - № 9.

4. Липцик Д. Авторское право и смежные права. - М., 2002.

5. Терентьева Л. В. Коллизионное регулирование авторских отношений в условиях развития Интернета (на примере России, США и Японии) // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. - 2013. - № 3.

6. Яковлева Р. Б. Проблемы перехода произведения в общественное достояние до истечения срока действия исключительного права на произведение // Имущественные отношения в Российской Федерации. - 2010. - № 2.

7. Abruzzi B. E. Copyright and the vagueness doctrine // University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. - 2012. - Vol. 45:2.

8. Boyle J. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. - Yale University Press, 2008.

9. Coombe R. Protecting cultural industries to promote cultural diversity: Dilemmas for international policymaking posed by the recognition of traditional knowledge // International public goods and the transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime / ed. K. Maskus, J. Reichman. - Cambridge University Press, 2005.

10. Cottier T., Panizzon M. Legal perspectives on traditional knowledge: The case for intellectual property protection // International public goods and the transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime / ed. K. Maskus , J. Reichman. - Cambridge University Press, 2005.

11. Dobson K. N. The Originality of Photographs for Purposes of Copyright Law Before and after Bridgeman Art Library, Ltd. v. Corel Corp. // Florida Coastal Law Review. - 2009. - Vol. X:319.

12. Dutfield G., Suthersanen U. Global Intellectual Property Law. - Edward Elgar, 2008.

13. Fishman S. The Public Domain. 4th ed. - Nolo, 2008.

14. Ginsburg J. C. Une Chose Publique'? The Author's Domain and the Public Domain in Early British, French and U. S. Copyright Law // Cambridge Law Journal. - 2006. - 65. - № 3.

15. Lange D. Recognizing the Public Domain // Law and Contemporary Problems. - 1981. - Vol. 44.

16. Lessig L. Free Culture - How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. - The Penguin Press, 2004.

17. Ochoa T. Origin and Meanings of the Public Domain // Dayton L. Rev. - 2002. - Vol. 28.

18. Rose M. Nine-Tenths of the Law: The English Copyright Debates and the Rhetoric of the Public Domain // Law and Contemporary Problems. - 2003. - Vol. 66.

19. Samuelson P. Digital Information, Digital Networks, and The Public Domain // Law & Contemporary Problems. - 2003. - Vol. 66.

20. Torremans P. Copyright Law : A Handbook of Contemporary Research. - Edward Elgarg, 2007.


Review

For citations:


Lutkova O.V. Public Domain in Cross-border Copyright Law Relations. Lex Russica. 2016;(12):56-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2016.121.12.056-067

Views: 553


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)