Maurice Hauriou’s Living Institutes: The Discovery of Sociolaw
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.186.5.009-029
Abstract
The paper analyzes the so-called institutional theory of the state and law, a significant role in the development of which was played by the French jurist and philosopher of law M. Hauriou. Legal institutionalism as a trend in a legal science is as fundamental as normativism or sociologism. C. Schmitt, who paid great attention to M. Hauriou’s research on public law problems, defined the direction of his French contemporary’s thought as a third way between normative and decisionist solutions to scientific and legal problems: if a normativist thinks with impersonal norms, then a decisionist sees only a personal solution that implements the law of a properly understood political situation. Thus, institutional legal thinking is deployed in structural supra-personal institutions and forms.
The main provisions of the institutional theory were used in the further development of European jurisprudence. Institutions are considered as corporate, organic and instrumental formations that consolidate and fix the processes of legal formation. In this case, the state itself acquires the qualities of an institution. The problem of institutionalization is inextricably linked with the problems of state sovereignty, forms of implementation of political power, and the construction of legal systems. M. Hauriou argues with various subjectivist concepts of the state and law, insisting on the priority of an objectivist approach to the problem of state power. His approach was supported by a number of prominent jurists, whose views are considered in this paper in comparison with the basic postulates of the theory of M. Hauriou. It was this scholar, along with another outstanding jurist L. Duguit, who formed the origins of the theory of the so-called sociolaw that has become so relevant in our time.
Keywords
About the Author
I. A. IsaevRussian Federation
Igor A. Isaev, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of History of the State and Law, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Bart R. O Rasine [About Racine]. Selected works: Semiotics: Poetics. Moscow; 1989. (In Russ.).
2. Benyamin V. Proishozhdenie nemeckoj barochnoj dramy [The origin of German Baroque drama]. Moscow; 2002. (In Russ.).
3. Berger P, Lukman T. Socialnoe konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge]. Moscow; 1995. (In Russ.).
4. Bourdieu P. Sotsiologiia politiki [Sociology of politics]. Moscow; 1993. (In Russ.).
5. Burckhardt J. Kul’tura Vozrozhdeniya v Italii [The civilization of the Renaissance in Italy]. Moscow; 1996. (In Russ.).
6. Weber M. O nekotorykh kategoriiakh ponimaiushchei sotsiologii [About some categories of understanding sociology]. Selected works. Moscow; 1990. (In Russ.).
7. Gehlen A. Obraz cheloveka v svete sovremennoi antropologii [The image of man in the light of modern anthropology]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo. 2007;3(37):37-51. (In Russ.).
8. Gentile E. Politicheskie religii [Political religions]. St. Petersburg; 2021. (In Russ.).
9. Douglas M. Kak mysliat instituty [How institutions think]. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).
10. Duguit L. Sotsialnoe pravo, individualnoe pravo i preobrazovanie gosudarstva [Social law, individual law and the transformation of the state]. Moscow; 1909. (In Russ.).
11. Durkheim E. Elementarnye formy religioznoi zhizni: totemicheskaya sistema v Avstralii [The elementary forms of religious life. The totemic system in Australi]. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.).
12. Jellinek G. Obshhee uchenie o gosudarstve [The general theory of the state]. St. Petersburg; 1903. (In Russ.).
13. Caillois R. Prazdnik [Fest]. College of sociology: St. Petersburg; 2004. (In Russ.).
14. Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya [Criticism of the ability of judgment]. Moscow; 1994. (In Russ.).
15. Le Bon G. Psikhologiya narodov i mass [Psychology of peoples and masses]. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).
16. Lunman N. Sotsial’nye sistemy. Ocherk obshchei teorii [Social systems. Outline of a general theory]. St. Petersburg; 2007. (In Russ.).
17. Mamardashvili M. K. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya [Cartesian reflections]. Moscow; 1993. (In Russ.).
18. Nancy JL. Corpus. Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.).
19. Hauriou M. Osnovy publichnogo prava [Fundamentals of public law]. Moscow; 1929. (In Russ.).
20. Tocqueville А. Staryj poryadok i revolyutsiya [The old regime and the revolution]. Moscow; 1997. (In Russ.).
21. Tönnies F. Obshchnost i obshchestvo [Community and society]. St. Petersburg; 2002. (In Russ.).
22. Vögelin E. Novaya nauka politike. Vvedenie [The new science of politics, an introduction]. St. Petersburg; 2021. (In Russ.).
23. Shapiro N. Politika protiv gospodstva [Politics against domination]. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.).
24. Schmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya [Political theology]. Political theology. Moscow; 2000. (In Russ.).
25. Henaff M. Klod Levi-Stross i strukturnaya antropologiya [Claude Levi-Strauss and structural anthropology]. St. Petersburg; 2010. (In Russ.).
26. Yampolskiy M. Fiziologiya simvolicheskogo [Physiology symbolic]. Book 1. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.).
27. Gauchet M. The Disenchantment of the World: A Political History of Religion. Princeton; 1997. (In Eng.).
Review
For citations:
Isaev I.A. Maurice Hauriou’s Living Institutes: The Discovery of Sociolaw. Lex Russica. 2022;75(5):9-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.186.5.009-029