Problems of the Typology of Legal Conflicts (Modern Interpretation)

The author justifies the need to broaden and supplement the classification of legal conflicts that is generally accepted in the theory of the state and law. This derives from the complexity of social relationships that form the subject of the legal regulation, as well as from the processes of differentiation and integration in law. The article favors considering collisions at two basic levels: 1) substantive, and (2) legal form (internal and external). The author provides arguments in favor of distributing conflicts in accordance with these criteria. The gradation in question is confirmed by examples from the existing legislation. However, certain types of legal conflicts arising in some branches are not covered by the existing classification. It is noted that domestic jurisprudence pays attention to the differences in the content of the legal regulation of objects, forms, etc. However, contradictions have been ignored for the purposes of legal regulation in values and principles, i. e. for the regulation of conflicts of legal ideology in some legal provisions. Special attention has been given to the resolution of conflicts in criminal law that is characterized as being highly specific. Resolving legal conflicts between national and international law remains one of the most complicated problems. Such conflicts are political in nature rather than legal. Thus, it is difficult to choose priorities in resolving these conflicts The revision of the typology of legal conflicts would result in changing the ways in which they are resolved, in particular, it will make it possible to distinguish between conflicts of law and their competition.

ubstantive conflicts, conflicts of form, conflicts of legal ideology, conflict between national and international law, hierarchical conflicts, political conflicts, functional collisions, conflicts of principles, competition of norms, type of legal regulation

1. Власенко Н.А. Коллизионные нормы в советском праве. Иркутск, 1984

2. Петров А.А. Иерархические коллизии в праве: автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. Красноярск, 2009.

3. Боголюбов С. А. Земельное право. М., 2011.

4. Петров Е. Д. Дифференциация и интеграция структурных образований системы российского права: автореф. дис.... д-ра юрид. наук. Саратов, 2015. С. 44

5. Юридический конфликт: сферы и механизмы: в 2 ч. / под ред. В.Н. Кудрявцева. М., 1994. Ч. 2. С. 67-68

6. Боголюбов С.А. Земельное право. - М., 2011.

7. Власенко Н.А. Коллизионные нормы в советском праве. - Иркутск, 1984.

8. Матузов Н.И. Коллизии в праве: причины, виды и способы их разрешения // Правоведение. - 2000. - № 5.

9. Уголовный закон. Опыт теоретического моделирования / отв. ред. В.Н. Кудрявцев, С.Г. Келина. - М., 1987.

10. Юридический конфликт: сферы и механизмы: в 2 ч. Ч. 2 / под ред. В.Н. Кудрявцева. - М., 1994.