Digital Violence against Children: The Concept, Types and Qualifications

The work proposes a systematic analysis of modern forms of digital violence against children. Based on its typical parameters, the author identifies key trends in the development of digital violent influence on minors (exponential growth, expansion of the technological base, habitalization, high latency and commercialization, a combination of online and offline forms, organization). Based on several legal and criminological criteria, the author provides the typology of digital violence and assesses the consistency of the author’s concept in its comparison with the approaches of international organizations and national expert centers. Considerable attention is paid to the legal assessment of individual manifestations of digital violence against children (cyberbullying, stalking, doxing, fraping, heppislapping, digital sextortion, online grooming, revenge porn, flaming, zumbombing and digital rape). The author analyzes algorithms for their qualifications and determines the degree of adaptability of criminal law to modern digital challenges and threats. Based on the principles of functional equivalence, the author applies existing models of qualification of violent crimes to the peculiarities of committing digital attacks and dwells on possible directions for the development of criminal legislation and judicial practice. The quintessence of the work is the idea of the need and timeliness of developing a universal model of criminal law and criminological prevention of digital violence against children, which would simultaneously take into account both its general criminogenic factors and prerequisites (misuse of personal data, cyberattacks and data leaks, lack of foundations of digital hygiene), and the content features of certain types of digital violence.

1. A Guide to Countering Gender Cyber-Violence (UNWomenTurkey). Available at: https://eca.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Field%20Office%20ECA/Attachments/.

2. Alekseeva TS. Intimate images of a person as a subject of violation of privacy. Criminal Law. 2023;4:3-13. (In Russ.).

3. Anderson CA, Bushman BJ, Donnerstein E, Hummer TA, Warburton W. SPSSI Research Summary on Media Violence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2015;15(1):4-19.

4. Artyushina OV. Violent crime and IT technologies. Lex russica. 2019;9:77-84. (In Russ.).

5. Barabash VV, Bordyugov GA, Kotelenets EA. Images of Russia in the world. Moscow; 2010. (In Russ.).

6. Chatzakou D, Kourtellis N, Blackburn J, De Cristofaro E, Stringhini G, Vakali A. Mean birds: detecting aggression and bullying on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Web Science Conference. 2017;13–22. Troy, New York; USA

7. Delfino RA. Pornographic deepfakes: the next tragic act of the phenomenon of «revenge porn» and the need to adopt a criminal law at the federal level. Actual Problems of Economics And Law. 2020;14(1):105-141. (In Russ.).

8. Gauhman LD. Combating violent assaults. Moscow; 1969. (In Russ.).

9. Gaukhman LD. Problems of the criminal legal struggle against violent crimes in the USSR. Noah IS ed.). Saratov; 1981. (In Russ.).

10. Karpov KN. Qualification of extortion in the threat of disseminating information about an offense committed by a person or an immoral act. Modern Law. 2018;5:77-83. (In Russ.).

11. Kudryavtseva VN, Naumova AV (eds.). Violent Crime. Moscow; 1997. (In Russ.).

12. Medvedeva AS, Dozortseva EG. Characteristics of online grooming as a type of sexual exploitation of minors (based on an analysis of correspondence between adults and children on the Internet ). Psychology and Law. 2019;9(4):161-173. (In Russ.).

13. Menshagin VD, Piontkovsky AA. Course of Soviet criminal law. Special part. Vol. 1. Moscow; 1955. (In Russ.).

14. Podgayny AM. The concept and forms of criminal violence against a person. Black Holes in Russian Legislation. 2006;4:429-431. (In Russ.).

15. Sementsova IA, Fomenko AI. Topical issues of preventing crimes committed by persons with a sexual preference disorder (pedophilia) via the Internet. Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2015;10:15. (In Russ.).

16. Yani PS. Issues of extortion qualification. Zakonnost. 2015;11:40-45. (In Russ.).

17. Zhmurov DV. Cybervictimology of extortion in the digital space. Asia-Pacific Region: Economics, Politics, Law. 2021;2:85-98. (In Russ.).

18. Zhmurov DV. Victims of cyberbullying: the state of the problem. Russian Investigator. 2023;1:45-50. (In Russ.).