Investigation Reports: Problems of Procedural Form and Value of Evidence

The paper deals with certain problems of the theory and practice of recording investigation activities as a requirement arising from historical traditions of national court proceedings and the general principles of the continental (Romano-Germanic) legal system. The author particularly emphasizes the legal significance of recording investigation activities as an undeniable merit of the Russian model of preliminary investigation. By this mechanism it essentially benefits before the relevant mechanisms applied in the Western countries, particularly in the United States of America. The first part of the article deals with the doctrinal, regulatory and application-oriented aspects of the investigation reports procedure. In particular, the author expresses skepticism about regulation of purely technical rules for recording investigative actions at the "high " legislative level. Such rules of investigative actions recording turn the federal law into a step-by-step instruction for illiterate and uncultured Investigators. In addition, a new application-oriented technology is proposed to familiarize investigation participants with the contents of protocols. The technology is based on the maximum comfort regime that is consistent with the legal value of the procedural form and that implies an adequate level of professionalism, legal awareness and responsibility of investigative officers. The second part of the article deals with the evidential value of investigative protocols in establishing circumstances relevant to a criminal case. Using the methodology of the previously formed concept of a "non-verbal" method of procedural cognition, taking into account the legal ambiguity of Art. 83 of the RF Code of Criminal Procedure, the author concludes that there is a serious doctrinal and legislative error, namely, the violation of the logical uniformity of the results of various investigative and other procedural actions. In the author's opinion, in some cases the evidence means a cognitive result, and in other cases the protocol itself is the form of recording of that result. In this regard, it is proposed to use unified methodological approaches both to the results of investigation activities and to the relevant protocols. The author argues that the evidence provided by Art. 83 The RF Code of Criminal Procedure, should henceforth be called the results of non-verbal investigative (judicial) actions.

Evidence in a criminal case, pre-trial proceedings, testimony, legal culture of the investigator, protocol of an investigative action, procedural cognition, investigation, criminal procedure proving, criminal procedure safeguards, investigative actions

1. Ананенко И.В. Допустимость протоколов следственных действий: автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. - Краснодар, 2005.

2. Белкин Р.С. Криминалистическая энциклопедия. - М.: Мегатрон-XXI, 2000.

3. Колесов О.М. Письменные доказательства в уголовном процессе России: автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. - Н. Новгород, 2006.

4. Манова Н.С. Еще раз о понятии следственного действия // Право, законодательство, личность. - 2012. - № 1 (14).

5. Миленин Ю.Н. Аудио- и видеодокументы как доказательства в уголовном процессе: автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. - Орел, 2009.

6. Очередин В.Т. Доказательства в уголовном процессе: сущность, источники, способы собирания. - М.: Юрлитинформ, 2009.

7. Победкин А.В. Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс: форма живого права или «бездушная» инструкция // Библиотека криминалиста. Научный журнал. - 2017. - № 3.

8. Порубов Н.И. Допрос в советском уголовном процессе. - Минск: Вышейшая школа, 1968.

9. Россинский С.Б. Концептуальные основы формирования результатов «невербальных» следственных и судебных действий в доказывании по уголовному делу: дис.. д-ра юрид. наук. - М., 2015.

10. Россинский С.Б. Права граждан при задержании. - М.: Минюст России, 2012.

11. Россинский С.Б. Сущность результатов невербальных следственных и судебных действий как доказательств по уголовному делу // Законы России: опыт, анализ, практика. - 2013. - № 9.

12. Савенко О.В. Протоколы следственных действий и судебного заседания как доказательства по уголовному делу: дис.. канд. юрид. наук. - Брянск, 2014.

13. Шишкин В.С. Документы в доказывании при производстве по уголовному делу: дис.. канд. юрид. наук. - М., 2012.