Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Embodied Virtual Agents: Expected Impact of Labor Relations

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2026.231.2.024-038

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence into the workplace is reshaping the employee-employer relationship, generally strengthening employers’ positions and complicating positions of workers. Until recently, AI deployment has been largely confined to applications with limited autonomy and to industrial and service robotics. By late 2024, however, leading technology firms announced the expected introduction of «virtual employees» in 2025, with the embodied virtual agents defined as autonomous intelligent systems capable of performing an expanding array of tasks, including many creative functions previously carried out by humans. Fueled by advances in generative AI, these agents are moving beyond gaming and virtual education into core economic activities. The capabilities of virtual employees risk exacerbating existing imbalances in labor relations and raise urgent questions for labor law. The study examines the legal challenges posed by embodied virtual agents and evaluates regulatory approaches to reconcile employers’ technological opportunities with the protection of workers’ social and labor rights.

About the Author

I. A. Filipova
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod; Samarkand State University
Russian Federation

Irina A. Filipova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Labor and 
Environmental Law; Head of the Central Asian Research Center for Artificial Intelligence Regulation

Nizhny Novgorod

 Samarkand, Republic of Uzbekistan



References

1. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2020;13(1):25-35.

2. Adams-Prassl J, Abraha H, Kelly-Lyth A, Silberman M, Rakshita S. Regulating algorithmic management: A blueprint. European Labour Law Journal. 2023;14(2):124-151.

3. Ahmmed A, Butts E, Naeiji K, Thiamwong L, Ancis J, Daher S. Aware Intelligent Virtual Agent’s Effect on Social Presence and Empathy of Caregivers. In: Jack R., Chollet M, Aylett R, Bickmore T, Marsella S, Lucas G. (eds.). IVA ’24: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Art. 27. P. 1–5. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2024.

4. Aloisi A, De Stefano V. Between risk mitigation and labour rights enforcement: assessing the transatlantic race to govern AI-driven decision-making through a comparative lens. European Labour Law Journal. 2023;14(2):283-307.

5. Aloisi A. Boss Ex Machina: Employer Powers in Workplaces Governed by Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence. In: Lo Faro A. (ed.). New technologies and labour law. P. 15–24. Selected topics. Giappichelli Pub; 2023.

6. Cheong BCh. The Rise of AI Avatars: Legal Personhood, Rights and Liabilities in an Evolving Metaverse. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law. 2024;2(4):857-885.

7. Chsheglov IA. Socialization: Agents, Institutions, Factors. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics. 2016;4:14-17. (In Russ.).

8. De Stefano V, Countouris N. «Lifting the Private-Law Veil»: Employer Authority and the «Contractual-Coating» of Worker Subordination. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal. 2024;44(3):1-20.

9. De Stefano V, Doellgast V. Regulating AI at work: labour relations, automation, and algorithmic management. Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research. 2023;29(1):9-20.

10. Elyoseph Z, Hadar-Shoval D, Asraf K, Lvovsky M. ChatGPT outperforms humans in emotional awareness evaluations. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14:1-7. Art. 1199058.

11. Filipova IA. Intelligent Robots, Cyborgs, Genetically Enhanced Individuals, Chimeras: the Future and the Challenges of Law. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law. 2024;2(4):741-781.

12. Korinek A, Stiglitz JE. Artificial intelligence and its implications for income distribution and unemployment. In: Agrawal A., Gans J., Goldfarb A. (eds.). The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda. P. 349–390. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2019.

13. Lim S, Schmälzle R, Bente G. Artificial social influence via human-embodied AI agent interaction in immersive virtual reality (VR): Effects of similarity-matching during health conversations. 2024. Available at: https://arxiv.org/html/2406.05486v1 [Accessed 12.01.2025].

14. Lloyd N, Chowdhry A, Lewis PR. Trustworthy Embodied Virtual Agents. In: Lee N. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games. P. 1917–1922. Springer, Cham Publ.; 2024.

15. Mancini M, Niewiadomski R, De Lucia G, Longobardi FM. A Virtual Agent as a Commensal Companion. In: Jack R, Chollet M, Aylett R, Bickmore T, Marsella S, Lucas G. (eds.). IVA ’24: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Art. 26. P. 1–4. New York: Association for Computing Machinery Publ.; 2024.

16. Nissim G, Simon T. The future of labor unions in the age of automation and at the dawn of AI. Technology in Society. 2021;67:1-9. Art. 101732.

17. Noy D, Ribeiro P, Iurgel IA. Embodied Virtual Agents as a Means to Foster E-Inclusion of Older People. In: Biswas P, Duarte C, Langdon P, Almeida L (eds.). A Multimodal End-2-End Approach to Accessible Computing. P. 153–172. London: Springer; 2015.

18. Oker A. Embodied social cognition investigated with virtual agents: The infinite loop between social brain and virtual reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality. 2022;3:1-8. Art. 962129.

19. Park JS, O’Brien JC, Cai CJ, Morris MR, Liang P, Bernstein MS. Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior. In: UIST ’23: The 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Art. 2. P. 1–22. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2023.

20. Rickenberg R, Reeves B. The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. In: CHI ’00: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. P. 49–56. New York: ACM Press; 2000.

21. Van Mulken S, André E, Müller J. The persona effect: How substantial is it? HCI ’98: Proceedings of HCI on People and Computers XIII. P. 53–66. London: Springer-Verlag Publ.; 1988.

22. Yashin AS. The two views on the feeling of agency. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy. 2023;5:25-40. (In Russ.).

23. Yousefi M, Crowe SE, Hoermann S, Sharifi M, Romera A, Shahi A, Piumsomboon T. Advancing prosociality in extended reality: systematic review of the use of embodied virtual agents to trigger prosocial behaviour in extended reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality. 2024;5:1-18. Art. 1386460.

24. Zhang J, Han B, Dong Z, Wen R, Lee GA, Hoermann S, Zhang W, Piumsomboon Th. Virtual triplets: a mixed modal synchronous and asynchronous collaboration with human-agent interaction in virtual reality. In: Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA ‘24) (ACM), 2024;366:1-8.

25. Zhao Zh, Chai W, Wang X, Boyi L, Hao Sh, Cao Sh, Ye T, Wang G. See and Think: Embodied Agent in Virtual Environment. In: Leonardis A, Ricci E, Roth S, Russakovsky O, Sattler T, Varol G. (eds.). Computer Vision — ECCV 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2025;15066:187-204.

26.


Review

For citations:


Filipova I.A. Embodied Virtual Agents: Expected Impact of Labor Relations. Lex Russica. 2026;79(2):24-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2026.231.2.024-038

Views: 322

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)