Transformation of the Law-Making Function of International Organizations

The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the transformation of the law-making function of international organizations, reveals the dialectic of the relationship between formal legitimacy and the actual effectiveness of their acts. It is proved that the evolution of theoretical approaches to the law-making of international organizations has gone from a contractual analogy through the theory of delegation to the concept of international legislation. It has been established that in modern conditions, the formal legal force of acts of international organizations does not always determine their actual effectiveness, namely the instruments of «soft» law often demonstrate a high degree of influence on the behavior of subjects of international law. The study, based on a set of general scientific and special legal methods, analyzes the law-making activities of key international organizations (UN, WHO, ILO, ICAO, OECD) and the problem of the legal validity of their acts. Special attention is given to the ultra vires doctrine and mechanisms for ensuring the effectiveness of advisory acts. Modern trends in the law-making activities of international organizations have been identified: the diversification of forms of rulemaking, the strengthening of technocratic elements, the interpenetration of regulatory regimes, the increasing role of regional organizations and non-state actors, the deformation of law-making procedures and increased attention to issues of legitimacy. The author concludes that it is necessary to find a balance between the effectiveness, legitimacy and flexibility of international rulemaking in the context of global challenges and fragmentation of international law.

1. Abashidze AKh, Gulyaeva EE, Trikoz EN. The technique and practice of international rulemaking: An overview of the materials of the international ESIL Conference. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki» [RUDN Journal. Legal Sciences Series]. 2022;2:517-533. (In Russ.).

2. Alasuutari P, Qadir A. Epistemic Governance: Social Change in the Modern World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019.

3. Alvarez JE. International Organizations as Law-makers. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.

4. Asamoah OY. The Legal Significance of the Declarations of the General Assembly of the United Nations. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 1966.

5. Buergenthal T. Law-Making in the International Civil Aviation Organization. New York: Syracuse University Press; 1969.

6. Chayes A, Chayes AH. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1995.

7. Cheng B. United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: «Instant» International Customary Law? International Law: Teaching and Practice. Cheng B, (ed.). London: Stevens & Sons; 1982. P. 237–262.

8. Danilenko GM. Law-Making in the International Community. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff; 1994.

9. Detter I. Law Making by International Organisations. Stockholm: Norstedt and Söner; 1965.

10. Elias TO. Modern Sources of International Law. Transnational Law in a Changing Society: Essays in Honor of Philip C. Jessup. Friedmann W, et al. (eds.). New York: Oxford University press; 1972. P. 34–69.

11. Footer ME. An Institutional and Normative Analysis of the World Trade Organization. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2006.

12. Kapustin AYa, (ed.). International law. General part: A textbook for Bachelor academic programs. 2nd ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow: Yurait Publ.; 2025. (In Russ.).

13. Kelsen H. The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems. London: Routledge; 2018.

14. Keshner MV. The UN Security Council Sanctions Committees as an institutional mechanism for the implementation of international sanctions. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizacii. 2013;1(13):23-28. (In Russ.).

15. Klabbers J. An Introduction to International Organizations Law. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.

16. Klabbers J. International Law. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020.

17. Klabbers J. Marginalized International Organizations: Three Hypotheses Concerning the ILO. In: Liukkunen U, Chen Y, (eds.). China and ILO Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International; 2014. P. 181–196.

18. Krylov NB, Shinkaretskaya GG. Acts of the international organization ultra vires and the consequences of their adoption. Sovetskiy ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 1988. Moscow; 1989. P. 108–114. (In Russ.).

19. Lauterpacht E. The Legal Effect of Illegal Acts of International Organisations. In: Bowett DW, et al. (eds.). Cambridge Essays in International Law: Essays in Honour of Lord McNair. London: Stevens & Sons; 1965. P. 88–121.

20. Levin DB. International law, foreign policy and diplomacy. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ.; 1981. (In Russ.).

21. Marzuki PM. An Introduction to International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.

22. Morozov GI. International organizations. Some questions of theory. 2nd ed., suppl. Moscow: Mysl Publ.; 1974. (In Russ.).

23. Pauwelyn J, Wessel R, Wouters J. Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

24. Schermers HG, Blokker NM. International Institutional Law. 6th ed. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff; 2018.

25. Seidl-Hohenveldern I. International Economic «Soft Law». Recueil des Cours. 1979;163:165-246.

26. Tammes AJP. Decisions of International Organs as a Source of International Law. Recueil des Cours. 1958;94:265-363.

27. Tunkin GI, Shestakov LN. Theory of international law: A monograph. Moscow: Zertsalo-M Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

28. Van Hoof GH. Rethinking the Sources of International Law. Deventer: Kluwer Law International; 1983.

29. Velizhanina MYu. «Soft» law: Its essence and role in the regulation of international relations. The author’s abstract of Cand. Diss. (Law). Moscow; 2007. (In Russ.).