Coercion Factor in the Context of "Soft Law"

The authors raise issues concerning the factors that determine compliance with the acts of “soft law” by participants of social interactions. At the same time, soft law is defined as a set of formalized general rules (norms, principles, criteria, standards) that do not have a legally binding nature, are not provided with official sanctions and are observed voluntarily due to the authority of their makers, the interest of the addressees and targeted social “pressure” that is put by the community on potential (and actual) violators. A key issue that arises in the context of “soft law” is whether law can exist without state coercion? If soft law is not secured by sanctions of a public-power nature, how is its binding character (validity) maintained? Is state coercion — in the form of direct violence or its threat — an attribute of a legal norm? The inclusion (or non-inclusion) of “soft law” norms in national legal systems, their application by courts and other law enforcement bodies, the authority and attractiveness of soft law as a regulatory system, etc., depend on the solution of these questions. Acts of “soft law” formally do not belong to the sources of law, do not contain legally binding provisions backed by state sanctions, but have some legal significance (sometimes essential) and sometimes — legal consequences. Ultimately, the authors conclude that by its nature, “soft law” per se is not legally binding, but the facts of universal recognition and application (primarily by the courts and other law enforcement agencies) give soft law instruments de facto binding character.

1. Fogelson Y. B. Myagkoe pravo v sovremennom pravovom diskurse [Soft law in the modern legal discourse]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2013. No. 9. (In Russian)

2. Chinkin C. M. The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law . International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1989. Vol. 38. No. 4.

3. Chinkin C. Normal Development in the International Legal System. Commission and Compliance : The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the Inter-national Legal System. D. Shelton (ed.). Oxford, 2000.

4. D'amato A. Softness in International Law : A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials : A Reply to Jean d'Aspremont. European Journal of International Law. 2008. Vol. 19. No. 3.

5. Di Robilant A. Genealogies of Soft Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 2006. Vol. 54. No. 3. P. 507-508.

6. Ellis J. Shades of Grey: Soft Law and the Validity of Public International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2012. Vol. 25. No. 2.

7. Galbraith J., Zaring D. Soft Law as Foreign Relations Law. Cornell Law Abstract. 2014. Vol. 99. No. 4.

8. Greco T. The Reality of Rights. On Horizontal and Vertical Relationships in Law. Soft Power. 2016. Vol. 2. No. 2.

9. Hart H. Legal and Moral Obligation . Essays in Moral Philosophy. I. Melden (ed.). Washington : University of Washington Press, 1958.

10. Hume D. Treatise of Human Nature. Book 3. Part I. Sect. I. The Essential Philosophical Works. Hertfordshire : Wordsworth Editions Limited, 2011.

11. Jhering R. Der Zweck im Recht. Erster Band. Leipzig. : Druck und Verlag von Breitkopf & Hartel, 1877.

12. Kaufmann-Kohler G. Soft Law in International Arbitration: Codification and Normativity. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2010. Vol. 1. No. 2.

13. Kelsen H. The Law as a Specific Social Technique. The University of Chicago Law Abstract. 1941. Vol. 9. No. 1.

14. Kohler J. Philosophy of Law. Boston. : The Boston Book Company, 1914.

15. Marmor A. Philosophy of Law. Princeton and Oxford : Princeton University Press, 2011. Pp. 42-43.

16. McGinn Th. The Expressive Function of Law. Roman Legal Tradition. 2015. Vol. 11.

17. Morth U. Soft Law and New Modes of EU Governance — A Democratic Problem? Paper presented in Darmstadt. Nov. 2005. URL: http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/typo3/site // Moerth.pdf (Accessed: 25.07.2018).

18. Peters A., Pagotto I. Soft Law as a New Mode of governance: A Legal Perspective. NEWGOV: New Modes of government. 2006.

19. Raz J. Practical Reason and Norms. London : The Ancor Press, 1975.

20. Rohl F. Kl. Grundlagen der Methodenlehre. Aufgaben und Kritik. Para 64. Enzyklopadie zur Rechtsphilosophie. URL: http://www.enzyklopaedie-rechtsphilosophie.net/component/content/article/19- beitraege/78-methodenlehre1 (Accessed: 25.07.2018).

21. Shelton D. L. Soft Law. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper. 2008. No. 322. P. 21—22. URL: http:// ssrn.com/abstract=1003387 (Accessed: 20.07.2018).

22. Somma A. Some Like it Soft. Soft Law and Hard Law in the Shaping of European Contract Law. Politics of the Draft Common Frame of Reference. 2009.

23. Weber M. Basic Concepts in Sociology. New York. : Citadel Press, 1962.

24. Weber M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York. : Oxford University Press, 1947.

25. Weeks G. The Use and Enforcement of Soft Law by Australian Public Authorities. Federal Law Review Forthcoming. 2014. Vol. 42. No. 1.