Types of a Legal Mistake Excluding Criminal Responsibility

The article deals with the problems of identification of such types of the legal mistake that exclude criminal liability. With regard to the legal regulation and on the basis of the provisions of the criminal law doctrine, the author gives his own classification of the legal mistake and substantiates the necessity of recognition of its legal significance. The author comes to the conclusion that the variety of legal mistakes should be systematized on the basis of two criteria each of which implies two variants of manifestation. They include the cause of the mistake (either a defect of lawmaking or a defect of perception of established normative requirements), as well as the nature of the mistake (either ignorance of the fact of existence of criminal law prohibition or ignorance of its content). Within the framework of a comprehensive classification based on various combinations of the criteria under consideration, four types of the legal mistake that exclude criminal responsibility are distinguished: 1) a mistake caused by a defect in lawmaking and related to the ignorance of the existence of the criminal law prohibition; 2) a mistake caused by a defect in lawmaking and associated with the ignorance of the content of the criminal law prohibition; 3) a mistake caused by a defect in perception of established normative requirements by a person and related to the ignorance of the fact of existence of the criminal law prohibition; 4) a mistake caused by a defect perception by the person of established regulatory requirements and associated with the ignorance of the content of the criminal law prohibition. The article deals with the problems of presumption of knowledge of the law and awareness of wrongfulness of the act with due regard to intersectoral links existing in criminal law. The author refers to the legal stance of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the European Court of Human Rights, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and relies in his conclusions on the examples from case law and jurisprudence, and makes references to foreign experience.

1. Bibik O. N. Osobennosti kultury kak obstoyatelstvo, isklyuchayushchee ili smyagchayushchee ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost [Features of culture as a circumstance excluding or mitigating criminal liability]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2013. No. 3. (In Russ.)

2. Dudorov A. A. Spetsifika yuridicheskoy oshibki pri sovershenii prestupleniy so smeshannoy protivopravnostyu [Specificity of legal error at commission of crimes with mixed wrongfulness]. Pravo Ukrainy [Law of Ukraine]. 2011. No. 9—10. (In Russ.)

3. Klebanov L. P. Nepravilnoe predstavlenie o neprestupnosti deyaniya [Improper understanding of non-criminal nature of the act]. Zakonnost [Legality]. 2012. No. 2. (In Russ.)

4. Naumov A. V. Rossiiskoe ugolovnoe pravo : v 2 t. [Russian Criminal Law: in 2 vol.]. Moscow, 2004. Vol. 1. (In Russ.)

5. Obrazhiev K. V. Formalnye (yuridicheskie) istochniki rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava [Formal (legal) sources of Russian criminal law]. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.)

6. Rarog A. I. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy po subektivnym priznakam [Problems of qualification of crimes on subjective signs]. Moscow, 2015. (In Russ.)

7. Sud Peterburga perevedet obvinenie tuvintsu, plokho govoryashchemu po-russki [The court of St. Petersburg will prosecute a Tuvinian who speaks poorly in Russian]. RIA Novosti. URL: https://ria.ru/spb/20130731/953242930.html (date of access: 24.03.2019). (In Russ.)

8. Ugolovnoe Pravo Rossii. Chasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya [Criminal Law of Russia. General and Special Parts]. A. V. Brilliantova (ed.). Moscow, 2015. (In Russ.)

9. Ugolovnoe ulozhenie (Ugolovnyy Kodeks) Federativnoy Respubliki Germanii : tekst i nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy [Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany: The Text and Scientific and Practical Commentary]. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.)

10. Yani P. S. O znachenii printsipa ignorantia juris nocet dlya vmeneniya sostavov ekonomicheskikh prestupleniy [On the significance of the principle ignorantia juris nocet for incrimination of elements of economic crimes]. Ugolovnoe pravo v XXI veke : materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii na yuridicheskom fakultete MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova [Criminal Law in the XXI Century: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference at the Faculty of Law of Lomonosov Moscow State University]. Moscow, 2002. (In Russ.)

11. Cooter R., Ulen T. Law and economics. New York, 2011.

12. Tonry M. Learning from the Limitations of Deterrence Research. Crime and Justice. 2008. Vol. 37. No. 1.